Volume 17, Issue 3 (7-2020)                   | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Dehghan M, Ghasemi A, Kashi A, Arabameri E, Molanorouzi K. Comparison of Motor Development in Preterm, and Term Children Aged 3 to 7 Years. Mod Care J 2020; 17 (3)
URL: http://mcj.bums.ac.ir/article-1-178-en.html
1- Department of Motor Development, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor of Physical Education, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. Email: a_gh_m2003@yahoo.com
3- Associate Professor of Motor Control and Learning Department, Sport Sciences Research Institude, Tehran, Iran
4- Associate Professor of Motor Behavior, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
5- Department of Sport Managment, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran
Abstract:   (196 Views)
Background: Human development is influenced by genetic, environmental, and social factors whose foundation is formed from infancy and childhood. Preterm birth and low birth weight are important issues that can affect the development and threaten the public health. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare motor development manipulation, balance, aiming, and receiving in low, very low birth weight, and normal children aged 3 to7 years. Methods: In this comparative study, 63 children were selected from among the preterm infants admitted to NICU ward. They were divided into three groups of (1) low birth weight children (mean 2066 ± 354 g) (n = 30), (2) very low birth weight children (mean 1325 ± 117 g) (n = 13), and (3) preterm twin children (mean 1781 ± 385 g) (n = 20).Also, 15 term children with an average weight (3345 ± 365 g) were selected. To evaluate the motor development of children, the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (Second Edition) (MABC-2) test was used. The results were analyzed by SPSS using one-way ANOVA test (P ≤ 0.05). Results: Low birthweight and very low birthweight children had poorer performance on manipulation, aiming, catching, and balance compared to normal children (P ≤ 0.05). Conclusions: VLBW children performed significantly poorer than LBW and Twin children on the subscales of posting coins, threading beads, drawing trail, one-leg balance, and walking heels raised.
Full-Text [PDF 215 kb]   (70 Downloads)    
Article Types: Research Article | Subject: General
Received: 2026/01/10 | Accepted: 2020/07/15 | Published: 2020/07/15

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Modern Care Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb